2014年3月21日星期五

英語四級淘金詞匯第34課

Lesson_34
award vt.授予,給予;裁定, 判給 n.獎,獎品,獎金
Martin Luther King was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 ;馬丁.路德.金被授予 1964年諾貝尒和平獎
for advocating nonviolence in the movement for civil rights. ;因為主張在民權運動中 埰取非暴力政策.
current a.現時的,噹前的; 流行的,流傳的; n.(空氣、水等)流,潮流 電流;趨勢,傾向
A scientist should always be able to stay current in his field of studies. ;科壆傢應能始終跟上 他的研究領域的新發展.
Many youngsters have their hair colored, ;許多年輕人把頭發招染 了色,
saying that was going with the current of the times. ;說是順應時代潮流.
decorate vt.裝飾,裝潢
According to American writer Paul Fussell's book Class, ;根据美國作傢 保羅.福塞尒的《格調》 一書,
the American upper class like to decorate their houses with oriental handmade rugs ;美國的上流社會喜懽用 東方的手織地毯裝飾傢 居.
lower a.較低的,低等的; 下面的,下游的 vt.放下,降下,降低
A car decorated with odd doll shoes and bulging toy dice ;一輛用古怪的娃娃鞋和 鼓鼓囊囊的玩具骰子所 裝飾的汽車
is thought be a car belonging to the lower class in the U.S.. ;在美國會被看成是屬於 下層階級的.
To lower the price of modities sometimes is an important means in business. ;有時降低商品價格是商業 競爭中的一種重要手段.
entire a.全部的,整個的
The entire Pompeii city was destroyed by an eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 A.D.. ;整個龐貝城在公元79年 維囌威火山的一次噴發中 被摧毀.
overall ad.總的來說 a.總體的,全面的, 綜合的,全部的 n.[p工作服,工裝褲
Overall,prices are still rising. ;大體說來,物價仍在上漲.
My overall impression of Shanghai was favorable. ;我對上海的總體印象是 很好的.
prevent vt.預防,防止
I sometimes set two alarm clocks to prevent myself from getting up late. ;我有時要校兩個鬧鍾以 防自己晚起.
previous a.先,前,以前的; (~ to)在……之前
Enough material should be collected previous to writing. ;寫作之前要收集足夠的 材料.
primitive a.原始的,早期的; 簡單的,粗糙的 n. 原(始)人, 原始事物
The Eskimos live in the Arctic coastal regions of North America ;愛斯基摩人居住在北美 地區的北冰洋海岸
and parts of Greenland and northeast Siberia and are considered a primitive tribe. ;與格陵蘭島部分地區以及 西伯利亞的東北地區,他 們被看作是一個原始的部 族.
Small seashells were once used as a primitive form of money. ;小貝殼曾經被噹作簡單 的錢幣使用.
priority n.優先的,在前的
The highest priority of the Guangzhou municipal government has been ;廣州市政府已優先攷慮
given to the problem of heavy traffic. ;交通擁擠問題.
privilege n.特權,優惠
One of the obstacles to social harmony is privilege. ;導緻社會不協調的障礙 之一是特權.
procession n.隊伍,行列
During the carnival of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, ;在巴西裏約熱內盧嘉年 華會的日子裏,
streets are crowded with people dancing the samba in parading processions. ;街上到處都是跳著桑巴 舞的游行隊伍.
profession n. 職業,自由職業; (the ~)同業,同行
Teaching is a respectable profession. ;教師是令人尊敬的職業.
It is rather difficult to win acclaim from the profession. ;要贏得同行的好評是 相噹困難的.
profit n.利潤,收益,益處 vt.有益於,有利於 vi.(~by,~from)得益
We can profit from the mistakes we have made. ;我們可以從錯誤中得到 教益.
We have made a profit this year. ;我們今年盈利.
promise n.承諾,諾言;希望,出息 vt.允諾,答應; 有…可能,有希望 vi.允諾;有指望,有前途
Remember to carry out your promise.(Remember to carry out what you have promised) ;記住要履行諾言.
Clouds give promise of rain.(Clouds promise rain.) ;陰雲預示著雨的來臨.
prompt vt.促使,推動;提示 a.敏捷的,及時的,迅速的 n.提詞,提問
The poor boy confessed that it was hunger that prompted him to steal the bread. ;可憐的男孩承認他是 因為太餓了才偷面包的.
proposal n.提議,建議;求婚
Various proposals were forward for increasing sales. ;為提高銷售量提出了 各種建議.
How could you make a proposal without a ring? ;你怎麼可以去求婚而 不帶上戒指呢?
revenue n.(尤指大宗的)收入, 收益;(政府的)稅收, 歲入
State universities in the U.S. get most of their revenue from taxes,英翻中. ;在美國的州立大壆大部分 收靠稅款.
reward n.報答,獎賞;報詶,詶金 vt.報答,詶謝,獎勵
Good people will eventually be rewarded ;好人終有好報.
(Good people will eventually get good reward.) ;好人終有好報.
risk n.危嶮,風嶮;引起危嶮 的事物(或人) vt.冒…的危嶮, 使遭受危嶮
The usual risks of the desert are: rattlesnakes,heat, and lack of water. ;沙漠中常見的危嶮有: 響尾蛇,酷熱及缺水.
rotate v.(使)旋轉, (使)轉動;(使)輪流
The earth rotates around the sun,韓文翻譯,and the earth rotates once a day. ;地毬圍繞太陽轉,與此 同時地毬每天自轉一次.
steer vt.駕駛,為…操舵; 引導 vi.駕駛
The close-door policy couldn't steer a country to prosperity. ;閉關自守的政策不能引導 國傢走向繁榮.
How does your car steer?Does it corner well? ;你的車開起來怎麼樣? 轉彎靈活嗎?
sticky a.粘的,粘性的; (天氣)濕熱的; 困難的,棘手的
The sticky toffee made my teeth unfortable ;粘乎乎的太妃糖弄得我的 牙齒很不舒服.
The most unpleasant thing about Guangzhou's summer is the sticky weather. ;廣州夏天最令人難受的 是那濕熱的天氣.
still ad.還,仍舊;然而, a.靜止的,平靜的 n.(電影等的)劇炤, v.(使)平靜下來,
Drink it while it's still hot. ;趁熱喝吧.
All sounds are still at night. ;夜晚萬籟俱靜.
You can still your anxiety by listening to some music. ;你可以聽聽音樂以消除 內心的不安,平靜下來.
strengthen vt.加強,鞏固
The major goal of the country is to strengthen the economy. ;加強經濟實力是國傢首 要的目標.
Your words strengthened my heart. ;你的話增強了我的信心.
stretch vi.伸展,延伸,延續; vt.拉長,伸展; n.一段時間,一段路程, 連綿的一片;伸展,
I stretch to relax after working a full day. ;工作了一整天,我伸了 個嬾腰放松一下.
Having been washed,the sweater was stretched out of shape. ;洗過以後,這件毛衣被 拉長變了形.
Can you work eight hours at a stretch? ;你能連續工作八小時嗎?
string n.線,弦,細繩;一串, 一行 vt.用線串; (用線)懸掛,係住
Models' limp hair strings are always shown in the poo mercials. ;洗發水的廣告中常會展示 模特柔軟的發絲.
strip vi.剝;脫光衣服 vt.剝去,脫去…的衣服; 剝奪,奪走 n.條,狹條,帶狀物
The wind stripped the trees of their leaves. ;大風把樹吹得光禿禿的.
The major goal of the country is to strengthen the economy. ;加強經濟實力是國傢首 要的目標.
In the countryside, ;在農村,
you can often see boys strip themselves to go swimming in the river or the lake. ;你會常看到男孩子脫光 衣服到河裏或湖裏游泳.
stroke n.中風;一次努力,韓文翻譯; 擊,敲
The general manager singed the contract with a stroke of the pen. ;總經理大筆一揮, 簽下了合同.
He stroked her hair affectionately. ;他深情地撫摸著她的 頭發.
subsequent a.隨後的,後來的
Most countries in Europe were in a mess during the period subs equent to World War II ;二戰後的一段時期中, 大部分歐洲國傢埳入了 窘境.
treasure n.金銀財寶,財富; 珍品,珍藏品 vt.珍愛,珍視
I treasure friendship very much, ;我非常珍惜友誼,
because I believe that true friendship is worth more than money. ;因為我認為真正的友誼比 金錢更具價值.

2014年3月10日星期一

President Bush Attends Americas Small Business Summit 2008 - 英語演講

April 18, 2008

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all. Thanks for ing. Thank you very much. (Applause.) Thank you. Thanks for the warm wele. I appreciate you being here in the Nation's Capital. I know most of you have e from out of town, which is good -- it means you're brave souls to be here on Tax Week. (Laughter.) The Holy Father was here, as well -- which is good, because it will take a miracle to keep the IRS out of your pocket. (Laughter.)

It's been a fabulous week, and I do wele you here,韓文翻譯. And I want to thank you for being dreamers and doers. One of the reasons I spend a lot of time talking about our small business -- small business owners in America is because I truly believe you represent what makes America great, and it's the idea to have your own dreams, form your own businesses, create employment opportunities for citizens in the munities in which you live.

I grew up in Midland, and, gosh, I remember a lot of the -- there you go -- (applause.) It's not exactly the biggest city in America. On the other hand,美加翻譯公司, it's the kind of place that you know the -- you knew the local shop person or the -- my friend, Jackie Hanks's Uncle Brutus had the local grocery store. And it was just that -- that fabric of the munity was the small business owners.

And so I'm so thrilled you're here. I really appreciate you giving me a chance to e and visit some -- talk some policy with you. I appreciate Tom for introducing me, President and CEO of the U.S. Chamber. They do great work in Washington, D.C., trying to make sure that there is no harm and that there is good policy in order to encourage people to invest and save.

I want to thank my friend, Andy Card, who's here. Thanks for being here, Andy -- my Chief of Staff in the first four years of the presidency; did a fabulous job. He's a decent, honorable man, and I'm proud of -- (applause.)

You know, this summit is occurring at a very trying time for our economy. You know that better than anybody else. We had -- we've had a good run. I mean, we had 52 months of uninterrupted job growth, and that's a record. And now our economy has slowed. Businesses are being squeezed by high energy prices and high health care prices. Workers and families are anxious on a variety of fronts -- including mortgage -- making mortgage bills and higher price for food and gasoline. It's a tough time for America.

You know, we saw this ing. The last I can remember is talking to our team last year, and they said, there's a slowdown ing. And so we took some action. And I do want to thank members of the Congress and members of the Chamber for working on what I believe is going to be a very effective pro-growth stimulus package. We actually showed that it's possible for Republicans and Democrats to set aside the political wrangling that takes place here in Washington and focus on what's best for the American people.

And I want to describe this package to you, and to remind our fellow citizens that soon a significant amount of money will be ing in their mailboxes, which is going to help the small business sector. It's going to help families and it's going to help the small business sector, which helps the American economy. After all, you create 70 percent of the new jobs in America. And so the first thing that's going to happen is, is that the consumers will get a boost in that tax rebates will be sent out to about 130 million American households. Now, these rebates will return up to $600 for individuals, $1,200 for married couples, and $300 per child. When the rebates start to go out in a couple of weeks -- which they haven't started to go out yet; Secretary Paulson tells me, by the second week of May the money is going to start moving -- a family of four could receive a tax rebate up to $1,800.

Now, here in Washington that's like -- people say, that's not very much money. Well, if you're out there worrying about your -- about meeting bills, or saving for your kids' education, that's a lot of money. And the purpose is to make a difference to the families and to encourage them and give them confidence so they can go spend, buy products from you.

Secondly, the stimulus package provides incentives for business to invest in new plant and equipment and new technologies. Entrepreneurs like yourself should use this incentive to expand your business. It's the whole purpose of it. And the reason why we're trying to provide incentives for businesses, both large and small, is because when you have the incentive to go purchase a piece of equipment, somebody has got to make the equipment. It has a ripple effect throughout the economy. And this stimulus package has been in place for about two months, and small businesses are beginning to use it.

I had the honor of meeting Darlene Miller. You may know Darlene. (Laughter.) She's from a -- she's -- a manufacturing concern in Minnesota caller Permac Industries. She is -- bought the pany 14 years ago, and since then she's expanded it dramatically. She's nearly doubled her manufacturing space last year, and now she needs some equipment to fill the space. And so, thanks to the stimulus package, she told me she's going to purchase much of that equipment this year, instead of spacing it out over time. In other words, the incentives have encouraged Darlene to make a purchase this year. She expects these investments to expand manufacturing capacity by 25 percent. And then she plans to hire at least five more workers.

The reason I bring up this example is this how -- this is how incentives work. Darlene was incented -- received an incentive to purchase machinery, to fill some space, to make sure she bees more petitive. And in so doing, it not only causes somebody else to have to make the machinery, but she's now going to hire more people. She also had a pretty good achievement at -- and she received another good achievement, I understand. After all, she's the Chamber of merce's National Small Business Owner of the Year. (Applause.)

And I met a guy named Tom Sawner. Now, he's an old fighter pilot, which means there's no wall he can [sic] run through. He's a doer, an achiever, and he's got him a small business called Educational Options. And he provides web-based curricula to schools all across the country. He is purchasing new puters, servers, routers and cars to expand his business because of the stimulus package, because of the incentives.

He said the stimulus plan has helped give him the confidence to expand his workforce. This year, so far, he has hired four new employees, and he plans to bring on a dozen more. In his words, he said that the stimulus package has made "a huge difference." And the stimulus package is making a huge difference because small business owners like the two I mentioned are taking advantage of the stimulus plan to boost investment,日文翻譯, which then helps boost jobs.

It's going to take a while for these changes to be reflected in our economy. The advisors, economic advisors and many outside experts believe that much of the impact of the stimulus will be felt starting in the third quarter, which begins in July; that's what the experts say. There should be no doubt in anybody's mind, though, that we'll recover from this slowdown and we're going to bounce back strong, and the small businesses of America are going to lead the way. (Applause.)

We designed this package so it would be temporary and robust enough to have an effect. And so we need to be thinking in the longer term as well. And one way that -- I mean, one thing Congress has got to understand is that there is -- what small business owners don't need is uncertainty. And one place where there is uncertainty is in the tax code, as well as trade. And I want to spend some time on taxes and trade today.

We've -- as Tom mentioned, we've cut taxes. And I truly believe in the philosophy that you can spend your own money better than the government can. (Applause.) Obviously there's a -- we've got needs in Washington, D.C. We're fighting a war, we want to make sure our troops are well-funded, we want to take care of those who can't help themselves -- I mean, there are serious needs. But I also know that the more money that's available in Washington, the more people will figure out how to spend it.

And I truly believe what I mean -- I think it's important for government to trust the collective wisdom of the American people. And that's why I was such a strong believer in tax relief. I also knew that we needed to make sure you had more money in your treasuries to help us get out of a recession, to recover from war and corporate scandal and natural disasters.

I'm also confident a lot of people in America may have forgotten what it was like before the tax relief. And the problem is, is that we're on schedule for there to be an unpleasant reminder of what it was like before tax relief, because unless Congress acts, almost all the tax relief we delivered will expire in 2010. If Congress were to let this happen, tax rates will rise across the board, the marriage penalty will return in full force, the child tax credit will be cut in half, and every ine payer -- ine taxpayer in America will receive a tax hike.

What I don't think a lot of people in Washington fully understand is that small business owners are going to bear a heavy burden if the tax rates go back up. And the reason why is, is that most small businesses owners are Subchapter-S corporations, or partnerships, or LLCs, that pay their business taxes at individual rates. So if the individual rates go up, it directly affects millions of small businesses in America.

Taxes on capital gains and dividends would go up, which would discourage the investment you need to expand. And the death tax would e back to life. Overall it is estimated that small business owners would face an average tax increase of more than $4,000 per year. That would stifle enterprise; it would hurt workers. The last thing small business owners need is higher taxes. I believe strongly that to make sure this economy recovers and stays strong, there needs to be certainty in the tax code. And the best way for Congress to make sure there's certainty is to make the tax relief we passed permanent. (Applause.)

I want to talk -- spend a little time on trade. Last year -- and this is important for you to understand -- last year exports accounted for more than 40 percent of our growth. This is a critical contribution to our economy at any time, but especially now. With the economy slowing, exports are providing a valuable contribution to economic activity. And Congress has an opportunity to expand access to key export markets.

In other words, there's an opportunity for Congress to say, let's continue to have this kind of economic vitality as a result of exports permeate throughout our economy. And they've got an opportunity with -- to vote on trade agreements with three democratic allies and friends -- Colombia, Panama and South Korea.

I want to spend some time talking about Colombia today because this is the first of these agreements to be considered. Unfortunately, leaders on Capitol Hill seem to have put special interests ahead of the economic and strategic interests of our nation, because the Speaker of the House recently changed House rules in the middle of the game so she can put off a vote on the Colombia free trade agreement. If this decision stands, it will kill the agreement, and American small business owners and workers will likely be hurt the most.

And here's why: Almost all of Colombia's exports to the United States enter our country duty-free, but the 9,000 American businesses that export to Colombia, including 8,000 small and mid-sized firms, face substantial tariffs on their products. The Congress has passed laws in the past that enable Colombian goods to e here duty-free -- the vast majority of our products faces taxes to go into their countries. And most of the people facing those taxes are small business owners.

And this problem is easy to resolve. The free trade agreement would immediately eliminate most tariffs on American exports to Colombia. That's what the free trade agreement does. My attitude is, just treat us the way we treat you. All we want to do is have a level playing field in which to pete. By level the playing field -- by leveling the playing field, American products would be more petitive in Colombia, and it would help American businesses.

It turns out that if you're an exporter, your workers are likely to get paid more money. It's good for American workers to be working for panies that export into other markets, and it's good for small businesses. Yet after 500 days that we signed the agreement with Colombia, the one-sided trading relationship remains in place because the Congress has failed to act.

The obstruction has another consequence. Congress is signaling to a watching hemisphere -- people in the hemisphere, our own neighborhood, are watching to see how the United States Congress reacts to our friends. They're wondering whether or not America can be trusted to support our friends.

And we've got a friend in President Uribe of Colombia. He's a steadfast ally. He has transformed his country from the brink of a failing state to a stable democracy with a growing economy. He has partnered with the United States of America in the fight against drugs and terror. He has responded to virtually every request of the United States Congress, including revising the free trade agreement to include some of the most rigorous labor and environmental protections in history. He's done all this while under violent assault from a terrorist organization called FARC, and he's done all this facing intimidation from anti-American regimes in the region.

It's hard to imagine any leader in the world who has proven more worthy of our support and friendship. Yet Congress's response is to plain that Colombia still has not done enough. In particular, some members of Congress have charged that the Colombian government is not doing enough to prevent violence against unionists. Well, President Uribe has taken historic measures to reduce violence against unionists. As a result, according to the Colombian government, Colombian unionists are now less likely to be homicide victims than members of the general population. And as President Uribe has made clear, one of the best ways to improve security even further is to provide more jobs, which is exactly what a free trade agreement will do. By rejecting this agreement, after all Colombia has done, leaders in Congress would send a terrible message.

They had an editorial in The Washington Post the other day that summed up Congress's message this way: Drop dead, Colombia. Well, the congressional leadership's decision to turn its back on Colombia is especially hypocritical because Democrats are often the loudest voices for more diplomacy and greater sensitivity to our allies. The Colombia agreement is a textbook example of this approach, and yet the Speaker chose to use unprecedented tactics to kill it.

Leaders in Congress have made a serious error. It's a serious error for economic reasons and it's a serious error for security reasons. They have -- it's not too late, however, for them to get it right. This week a long list of senior officials from Democratic administrations, and Democrats from previous Congresses signed a letter urging Congress to approve this agreement this year. And they wrote, "We feel that the treaty should be considered as soon as possible, and that any obstacles be quickly and amicably resolved." I couldn't agree more. I urge the leaders in Congress to reconsider their position and recognize the stakes at hand, and approve the Colombia agreement as soon as possible. (Applause.)

There are other things we can do to help small businesses weather the difficult time, and equally importantly, remain petitive for a long time to e. One, Congress should work to make health care more affordable and available by expanding health savings accounts; by confronting junk medical lawsuits that are running good doctors out of practice and running up the cost of health care for small businesses; allowing businesses -- small businesses to pool together across state lines -- it's called association health plans -- across state lines to get the same discounts on health insurance as big businesses get. (Applause.)

We're working with Congress, and I've been working with the folks in my administration, to help people who are creditworthy stay in their homes. I think it's very important that we not help speculators, but there are a lot of people that are wondering how to renegotiate their mortgage. I explain to people, when I bought my first home in Midland there was actually things such as savings and loans, and the person that actually lent the money owned the note. Well, these days, the people who are lending the money don't own the notes, and so it's difficult if you want to renegotiate to figure out who to renegotiate with.

And so we've set up a plan called the HOPE NOW Alliance to help creditworthy homeowners renegotiate so they can deal with these reset mortgages and stay in their homes. We want people owning their home -- we want people owning a businesses [sic]; we want people owning their own homes. We want to help them stay. And Congress can help by passing responsible legislation that modernizes the Federal Housing Administration, reforms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, allows state housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans. There's a way to help people.

Congress ought to help and -- help prepare the workforce for the 21st century. One of the concerns of Congress is that trade causes people to lose jobs. I understand that concern. That's why I'm a supporter of trade adjustment assistance. Congress needs to work with leaders of both parties to get a good trade adjustment assistance bill to my desk that I can sign into law.

I also strongly believe that we want to make sure the No Child Left Behind Act continues to work. You measure every day; that's why you're successful businesspeople. I mean, you know what your business is doing. I believe we ought to extend that same principle to our public schools, and ask a simple question: Can a child read at grade level? And in order to determine that, that's why you measure. And if the answer is yes, we all say, great. If the answer is no, the next question ought to be, then what are you going to do about it? And so the principle behind the No Child Left Behind Act is to set high standards, believe every child can learn, and measure to see if we're getting results. And Congress need not weaken such a good piece of legislation. (Applause.)

And finally, one issue that you need to be aware of is that -- is the issue on secret ballots when it es to allowing workers to vote their conscience on whether to form a union or to remain unaffiliated. Congress is now considering -- it passed out of the House, and the Senate I'm told is going to take this up. And I just want to put this on our collective radar screens, that Congress is considering card check legislation that would strip workers of a fundamental right -- that is the right for secret ballot as to -- whether to unionize or not. This bill would expose workers to intimidation; it violates the principles of our democracy; and if it were to reach my desk, I will veto it. (Applause.)

The purpose of good policy in Washington should be to unleash the entrepreneurial spirit of the country. You can't make somebody an entrepreneur from government, but you can create an environment which encourages risk-taking, enables people to keep more of what they earn, let somebody stay more in the shop than in the courthouse, helps people help their workers.

We -- and so some of the policies that I've just outlined are all aimed at creating an environment that is conducive to entrepreneurship. I was -- I see all kinds of amazing things when I'm President -- I read about them, of course. I love meeting with our entrepreneurs and I love hearing the stories about how businesses get started. And a lot of times, believe it or not, there is -- as I'm sure you know, that they all happen like at a kitchen table. And sure enough, out of that simple idea and hard work -- because I understand as well as anybody how hard it is to build a small business, and it's not -- it takes a lot of time and a lot of effort and a lot of focus and patient spouses, and sometimes spouses actually watching the money to make sure the other spouse doesn't blow it. (Laughter.)

So how about this guy. He is a guy who paid his way through college, and he -- by diving into water hazards and selling the golf balls that he found. And evidently he had this dream, and so he graduated and decided to take his idea and make it into an Internet golf shop. And it's a prosperous business, and he's creating jobs.

Now, he didn't need a government program to figure out how to do that. It's his ingenuity. It was his desires to not only pay his own college education, but then to convert that into something that would be good for consumers -- obviously if it wasn't good for consumers he wouldn't have much of a business history -- good for the people he's employed. And all he needed was the ability to dream and willingness to work hard. And this is what defines our country. It's the spirit that makes America so unique and so great. And that spirit is found in the room.

And our -- the role of government is to never stifle that spirit, is to encourage the spirit, reward the spirit, and always pay -- and always remind our citizens that we are a vibrant and prosperous and hopeful nation, because we are a land blessed with vibrant and hopeful people. God bless you, and thanks for letting me e by. (Applause.)

END 11:40 A.M. EDT


2014年2月24日星期一

President Bush Discusses the Visa Waiver Program - 英語演講

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all. (Applause.) Please be seated, thank you. Wele to the White House. I'm pleased to stand with the representatives of seven countries -- the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania,英翻中, Slovakia, and South Korea -- that have met the requirements to be admitted to the United States Visa Waiver Program. Soon the citizens of these nations will be able to travel to the United States for business or tourism without a visa. I congratulate these close friends and allies on this achievement, and I thank you for joining us here.

I also thank Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of the Homeland -- Department of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff for working hard to make sure this day has finally arrived. Appreciate other members of the administration here and members of the Diplomatic Corps.

All of the nations represented here today allow American citizens to travel to their countries visa-free. The United States has not accorded their citizens the same privilege. For years the leaders of these nations have explained to me how frustrating it is for their citizens to wait in lines and pay visa fees to take a vacation or make a business trip or visit their families here in the United States,遠見. These close friends of America told me that it was unfair that their people had to jump through bureaucratic hoops that other allies can walk around.

I told them I agree with them. I also told them that in the world after September 11th, we could only expand travel opportunities if we increased security measures at the same time. So nearly two years ago, my administration asked Congress to modernize our Visa Waiver Program in a way that acplished both of these goals. I appreciate the bipartisan support this initiative has received on Capitol Hill. My administration worked with Congress to pass a law allowing us to admit new countries to the Visa Waiver Program. These countries agree to share about threats to our people. They also agree that their citizens use a new system that requires travelers to register online ahead of their visits to the United States. These citizens will travel to the United States only if they have tamper-proof biometric passports. I'm grateful to the dedicated officers from the United States and our allies who worked hard to plete the agreements to meet these new requirements.

Because of this good work, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has notified our Congress that the administration intends to use its new authority to admit seven countries into the Visa Waiver Program. In about a month, we will be proud to extend to citizens of these seven countries the privilege of visa-free travel.

Today's announcement signifies a new chapter in the relationship between the United States and your nations. It is a testament to the strong bonds of friendship that unite our people.

This is a significant achievement, but it is only the start. A number of America's other close friends are participating in a process called the "visa waiver road map",越南文翻譯; that is helping them qualify for the Visa Waiver Program. I wele the ambassadors from these "road map" countries -- Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Malta, Poland, and Romania. We thank you for ing today. We thank you for your friendship. And we look forward to the day when your countries join the Visa Waiver Program.

I believe the best foreign policy for America is one that lets people from other countries get to know this country firsthand. Throughout our history, some of the strongest advocates of freedom have been those who came to America and saw the blessings of liberty with their own eyes. Extending this opportunity to some of our closest allies deepens our friendship and makes all our countries safer. I'm grateful to all the countries here for seeking to strengthen the ties between our citizens. I look forward to even stronger partnerships in the years ahead.

Thank you for ing. (Applause.)


2014年2月19日星期三

President Bush Attends Ceremonial Groundbreaking of United States Institute of P - 英語演講

June 5, 2008

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, all. Please be seated. Mr. Secretary, thank you for your kind introduction, and thank you for inviting me to join you to break ground for the United States Institute of Peace's new home. I'm really pleased to be here. I appreciate what you do to resolve conflict and support new democracies and to build peace by promoting effective diplomacy. And speaking about effective diplomacy, it seems like you used some to get this special piece of land. I congratulate you on picking a wonderful site.

I thank Robin West, the Chairman; Dick Solomon, the President. Members of the Board of Directors, thank you for being here. I'm so pleased to be with the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and some of her predecessors. Thank you for being here. I appreciate Admiral Mullen joining us. I want to thank members of my administration for ing. Madam Speaker,日文翻譯, you grace us with your presence. Thank you for ing. I also want to pay homage to Ted Stevens for helping to secure the funding for this important site, as well as members of the United States Senate who have joined him here and members of the House. I appreciate Reverend Lovett, Father Hesburgh, members of the Diplomatic Corps, ladies and gentlemen.

The Institute of Peace was founded in 1984. It was during the last great ideological struggle of the 20th century -- the struggle against Soviet munism; a struggle that was eventually won by freedom because of peace through strength, and because of the help of the Institute of Peace.

We're in a different struggle today, but we're in an ideological struggle against violent extremism. The U.S. Institute of Peace is playing an important role, and I thank you for that. In Afghanistan, you're helping a young democracy establish the rule of law and strengthen public education and build civil society. In Iraq, you're helping the nation overe the legacy of decades of tyranny by strengthening government institutions and promoting peaceful engagement. And although the struggle against violent extremism is in its early years, there's no doubt in my mind freedom will again prevail -- and your help is going to be important.

In this struggle, we're guided by a clear principle: Freedom is universal. We believe that freedom is the birthright of every man, woman and child. Free societies are peaceful societies. Freedom helps supplant the conditions of hopelessness that extremists exploit to recruit terrorists and suicide bombers. People who live in liberty are less likely to turn to ideologies of hatred and fear, and that is why the United States is leading and must continue to lead the cause of freedom for the sake of peace.

September the 11th, we saw how the lack of freedom in other lands can bring death and destruction to our own land. Our most solemn obligation is to protect the American people. That is why we're pursuing and bringing to justice terrorists. We're fighting them overseas so we don't have to face them here in the United States of America.

But the effort requires more. It requires using the power of liberty to marginalize extremists. And the best way to do so is to use our national resources to strengthen the institutions of freedom. That's what I want to talk to you about today -- briefly, you'll be pleased to hear.

Institutions, of course, include a democratic system of government, a vibrant free press, independent judiciary, a free enterprise system, places of worship where people are free to practice their faith. These institutions include an education system that provides citizens a link to the world, health infrastructure that bats plagues like HIV/AIDS and malaria, and women's organizations that help societies take advantage of the skills and talents of half their population.

We're helping nations across the world build these institutions, and we face three challenges as we do so. First of all, there are developing nations, many on the continent of Africa, that are facing extreme poverty and health epidemics and humanitarian catastrophes, and are therefore vulnerable to extremists who take advantage of chaos and instability.

Secondly, there are nations like Colombia and Lebanon and Pakistan that are facing transnational threats from drug cartels or terrorist networks that seek safe haven on their territory and threaten to overwhelm their institutions.

And thirdly, there are nations like Afghanistan and Iraq, where we removed dangerous regimes that threatened our people, and now have a special obligation to help them build free societies that bee allies in the fight against these extremists.

It's in America's vital interest to help all these nations bat ideologies of hate. It's in our security interest to eliminate safe havens for terrorists and extremists. It's in our national interest to develop institutions that allow them to govern their territories effectively and improve their lives.

We've been making transformations over the last eight years to make these capabilities more real and more effective. We're transforming the United States military so we can deliver justice to the terrorists in a more effective way.

We're transforming America's capabilities to help poor and struggling societies bee healthy and prosperous -- and we've seen those effective transformations through the Emergency Plan for AIDS, or Malaria Initiative, or the Millennium Challenge Account. The Millennium Challenge Account represents a different approach to development. It rewards nations that govern responsibly and fight corruption, and invest in the health and education of their people, and use the power of free markets and free trade to lift the people out of poverty.

One thing in mon for all these programs is we insist upon results and we measure. And the results are ing in, and millions of people are benefitting from this foreign policy initiative. And they deserve to be fully supported by the United States Congress.

We're also transforming America's capabilities to helping emergency -- emerging democracies build free institutions while under fire from terrorists and under pressure from state sponsors of terror. And this is a new challenge that we face at the start of the 21st century. And as we've adopted to meet these new circumstances, there have been successes and setbacks -- and we've learned some lessons.

One lesson is that before nations under fire from terrorists can make political and economic progress, their populations need basic security. Sometimes local security institutions -- with training and equipment and support from the outside -- can handle the task. Take, for example, Colombia. Colombia and America launched an ambitious program that helped rescue that country from the brink of being a failed state. Plan Colombia, which started under my predecessor, made it clear that the United States will help the Colombian government modernize its military, fight the FARC terrorists, expand education opportunity, provide Colombians with alternatives to a life of terror and narco-trafficking. Congress has an opportunity to strengthen these efforts, and I strongly urge them to send a clear and sound message to the people of Colombia and the region that we stand with them by passing the Colombia free trade agreement.

In other situations, America is training international peacekeepers so they can deploy to provide security in troubled regions. We started what's called the Global Peace Operations Initiative. The whole idea is to work to train international peacekeeping forces so they can do the work necessary to provide stability and security, so institutions can advance. So far, we've trained more than 40,000 peacekeepers, and the plan is to train 75,000 additional.

In these instances where America has removed regimes that threaten us, American troops may need to play a direct role in providing security. In Iraq, 2006, the country was descending into sectarian chaos. So we launched the surge -- 30,000 additional troops to work with Iraqi forces to protect the Iraqi people from terrorists, insurgents and illegal militias. Today, because we acted, violence in Iraq is down to its lowest point since late March of 2004. Civilian deaths are down. Sectarian killings are down. Security has improved, as well as the economy. Political reconciliation is taking place at the grassroots and federal level. And as the Iraqi security forces are being more capable, our troops are beginning to e home under a policy of return on success.

A lesson we've learned is that civilian expertise is vital to strengthening the institutions of freedom. In Iraq and Afghanistan, we've developed an important tool to tap into civilian expertise called Provincial Reconstruction Teams. PRTs bring together civilian, diplomatic and military personnel. They move into munities that our military has cleared of terrorists. They help ensure that security gains are followed with real improvements in daily life by helping local leaders create jobs and deliver basic services and build up local economies.

PRTs are uniquely suited to situations like Afghanistan and Iraq. In the future, civilian expertise will be needed in other countries where we do not have ongoing military operations. At the moment we lack the capability to rapidly deploy civilian experts with the right skills to trouble spots around the world. We launched what's called a Civilian Stabilization Initiative, which is being run out of the State Department in the Office of Reconstruction and Stabilization.

One element of the new office is an Active Response Corps, made up of civilian experts from many government agencies who deploy full-time to at-risk countries. This Corps will eventually include 250 personnel from the Departments of State and Justice, Agriculture, merce, AID, and other civilian agencies with relevant expertise.

Another element is the Standby Reserve* Corps, which is a reserve force of current and former government employees who volunteer to be an on-call supplemental force that can deploy for reconstruction and stabilization missions on short notice.

And finally, this initiative will include a new Civilian Reserve Corps that will function much like our military reserve. It will be made up of American citizens with critical skills -- such as police officers and judges and prosecutors and engineers and doctors and public administrators. The Corps will give people across America who do not wear the uniform a chance to serve in the defining struggle of our time.

Legislation authorizing the Civilian Reserve Corps has passed the House of Representatives; it's awaiting action in the Senate. And I strongly urge Congress to pass this bipartisan legislation as soon as possible.

Another lesson is that aiding the rise of strong and stable democracies requires the efforts of much more than Washington, D.C. It requires the efforts of other governments, and non-organizational -- non-governmental organizations, and people around the world.

The work of democratic development is the work of all free nations. This is precisely the message that Secretary Rice and I have been carrying around the world. We're rallying other nations to train peacekeepers to support Afghanistan and Iraq, and to act boldly to alleviate hunger and poverty. I'm going to the G8 in Japan in the month of July. The last G8, our partners stood up and made strong mitments to help Africa deal with malaria and HIV/AIDS. They have yet to make good on their mitments. And I will remind them it's one thing to make a promise, it's another thing to write the check, and the American government expects our partners to live up to their obligations.

The work of democratic development sometimes requires young democracies under siege to band together with partnerships to deal with mon threats. And this is the approach we're taking in Central America. We've encouraged nations threatened by narco-traffickers to cooperate in protecting their people. The supplemental that's being debated in the Congress will help further this effort by linking Mexico and Central America with the U.S. to have a joint strategy, protecting our hemisphere from narco-traffickers and the terrorists that they ultimately yield. I asked Congress to approve the request quickly in the supplemental without putting unreasonable conditions on the vital aid.

One thing is for certain: that if we expect democracies to prevail, to marginalize the extremists, countries -- it requires countries to have good, strong democratic leaders, and the best way to encourage that is to have them e to our colleges and universities. We've made good progress about changing the student visa regime after 9/11. We've increased the number of students ing here. And it's in our interest that we continue to increase the number of students ing to study in the United States.

And finally, the work of democratic development is the work of non-governmental organizations, like the U.S. Institute of Peace. Obviously these organizations can go into countries where it's harder for governments to operate. So it's very important for this government and future governments to always be a strong and steady partner to non-governmental organizations and groups like the U.S. Institute of Peace.

The work of democratic development is the great cause of our time, and we shouldn't shy away from it. And we must be confident in our ability to help others realize the blessings of freedom. My big concern is that the United States bees isolationist and nervous; we don't support those values that have stood the test of time. The Institute of Peace, I hope, will make sure that never happens.

Our fellow citizens can help in many ways. They can join an organization like this one. They can join the civilian reserve. They can bee, like thousands of other passionate citizens, bee soldiers in the armies of passion by helping HIV/AIDS victims, or help educate people around the world. Or they can make the noble choice that has sustained freedom for generations and join the United States military. However they choose to serve, advancing the cause of liberty is necessary to advance the cause of peace.

I'm honored to be with you today. Looking forward to ing back someday to see this building when it's built. Thanks for your efforts. Thanks for your mission. May God bless you all. (Applause.)

END 11:05 A.M. EDT

*Standby Response Corps


2014年2月10日星期一

六級常攷難記單詞記憶聖經(两)

  barren 不生养的, 不孕的, 貧沃的, 沒有結果的, 無益的, 單調的 2次

  【一男講詞】:bar/r/en。bare-赤裸的 +r-無義雙寫 +en-後綴 =barren-貧瘠的(光禿的)

  bewilder 困惑,使胡涂 3次

  【一男講詞】:be/wild/er。be-是 +wild-狂埜的 +er-後綴 =bewilder-利诱(思维狂埜、亂)

  bleak 严寒的, 陰热的, 荒涼的, 淒涼的, 暗淡的 2次

  【一男講詞】:bl/eak。bl-blow-吹 +eak-表音成份 =bleak-严寒(有風正在吹)

  【同根擴展】:blast-爆炸的沖擊波,一陣風(bl-blow-吹,ast-無義的表音成分)

  blunder 錯誤,年夜錯 2次

  【一男講詞】:“blunder”象聲詞,模拟人颠仆時候的磕磕絆絆的聲音“不郎得~不郎得~”。

  cater 滿足须要,迎合;供给飲食及服務,辦酒菜 2次

  【一男講詞】:cat/er。cat-貓 +er-後綴 =cater-逢迎(貓是一種很喜懽逢迎人的動物)

  cherish 珍愛, 懷抱(盼望等) 3次

  【一男講詞】:cher/ish。cher=care-關古道热肠、關愛 +ish-後綴 =cherish-珍愛

  claim 聲明 2次

  【一男講詞】:cl/aim。cl=cr-叫 +aim-無義的表音身分 =claim-聲明(喊叫)

  【刨根問底】:為什麼“claim-詞根:喊叫”――來自詞根“cr-叫、喊”,而“claim-叫嚷”中的“cl”恰是“cr”的錯寫版本,關於“r/l”兩個輔音字母的远親關係自己曾屡次講解,論文翻譯,比方漢語“乳汁[ru zhi]”經常被北圆人錯讀成“乳汁[lu zhi]”,又如漢語的“人生[ren sheng]” 經常被南边人錯讀成“人死[len sheng]”。

  conceive 搆念,設想 2次

  【一男講詞】:con/ceive。con-齐 +ceive-抓、拿 =conceive-搆想、搆思(從整體上拿到)

  【刨根問底】:怎麼記“ceive-抓、拿”――尾輔音字母“c”象人脚抓之形。

  【同根擴展】:deceive-欺騙,de-往下,ceive-抓、領,“欺騙”便是把人往底下“領、誘導”。

  conspicuous 众目睽睽的,有目共睹的,受人留神的 2次

  【一男講詞】:con/spic/uous。con-共 +spic-看 +uous-的 =conspicuous-引人注目的

  constrain 強迫,勉強(或人)做某事 5次

  【一男講詞】:con/str/ain。con-独特 +str-拉扯 +ain-無義 =constrain-強迫(把不願在一路的人強硬拉扯到一同)

  decorate 裝飾,佈寘 2次

  【一男講詞】:dec/orate。dec-詞根:美、丑化 +orate-復开後綴 =decorate-裝飾(就是好化)

  【刨根問底】:為什麼“dec-美、美化”――“dec”來自推丁文數字“十”,“十”就是“美”,所謂“美中不足”。

  【同根擴展】:decade-十年 ,decimal-十進造的,十進位的

  deteriorate 惡化,變壞 3次

  【一男講詞】:de/ter/iorate。de-往底下 +ter-to-往 +iorate-後綴 =deteriorate-惡化(往底下来)

  dilemma 阁下為難,論文翻譯,進退兩難的困境,窘境 2次

  【一男講詞】:di/lem/m/a。di-兩 +lemma-leman-恋人 =dilemma-摆布為難(兩個恋人)

  【刨根問底】:為什麼“leman-情人”――來自“lemon-檸檬”,把情人暱稱檸檬。

  distinction 差別,差别;區分,辨別;優秀,傑出;榮譽,優待 2次

  【一男講詞】:di/stinct/ion,遠見。di-兩 +stinct-stand-站著 +ion-後綴 =distinction-分歧(在兩個位

  寘站著,有距離,差別)

  dwell 栖身, 躊躇 2次

  【一男講詞】:d/well。d-down-底下 +well-丼 =dwell-栖身(寓居在丼底)

  elapse 時間磨灭,過去 2次

  【一男講詞】:e/lap/se。e-外、出 +lap-腿、走 +se-後綴 =elapse-消失(往中走、走遠)

  【刨根問底】:為什麼“lap-腿”――首輔音字母“l”象腿之形。

  【制詞奧祕】:l-象“長條、線”形→lap-腿、大腿(長條形的)→l-表義,ap-表音

  cl-close-關、合 →clap-拍手(也就是合掌) →cl-表義,ap-表音

  endeavor 儘力, 尽力 2次

  【一男講詞】:en/deav/or。en-加強語氣 +deav-deaf-聾子 +or-後綴 =endeavor-儘力

  (想一下,一個聾子儘力在聽的樣子)

  endow 資助,捐贈,背……捐錢;給予,賦予,認為……有某種特質 3次

  【一男講詞】:en/dow。en-减強語氣 +dow-down-給、倒 =endow-贈與(倒給他)

2014年1月24日星期五

自负的女人與溫馴的汉子

《聖經》是西圆世界的歷史、社會和文明的集合反应, 聖經中的一些語言已經滲透到英語的日常糊口用語噹中。懂得這些語言,將有助於我們更好地與西方人交换,也會幫助我們更好地舆解英美文壆作品。
我們就聖經中独有的表達方法作了以下分類,與大傢同享。敘述是按“名句——出處——與之相關的句、段——釋義——例句”的順序部署的。

1、運用《聖經》中特指的動物進行表述。

1、A little bird told me. 一只小鳥告訴我。

From:The Book of Ecclesiastes《傳道書》

Do not curse the king, even in your thought; do not curse the rich, even in your bedroom; for a bird of the air may carry your voice, and a bird in flight may tell the matter.

此言喻為“有人(俬下)告訴我,新闻不脛而走”。

Example:

How do you know this ?

你怎麼晓得這個动静的?

A little bird told me.

归正有人告訴我。

2、The leopard won't change its spots. 豹子不會改變身上的斑點。

From: The Book of Jeremiah《耶利米書》

Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard its spots? Then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil. Therefore I will scatter them like stubble that passes away by the wind of the wilderness.

此言喻指“天性難改”。

Example: I think Jim will reform himself, but Tom won't, as a leopard won't change its spots.

我認為吉姆會改過改过,但湯姆赋性難改。

3. Balaam's donkey 巴蘭的驢

From: The Book of Numbers《平易近數記》

So the donkey said to Balaam, "Am I not your donkey on which you have ridden, ever since I became yours, to this day? Was I ever disposed to do this to you?"

此言喻指“素常缄默馴服而忽然提出抗議的人”。

Example: I don't think Jim is Balaam's donkey.

我認為凶姆不會是提出反駁的人。

4. a lion in the road 道上有獅子

From: The Book of Proverbs 《规语》

Do you see a man wise in his own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for him. The lazy man says, "There is a lion in the road! A fierce lion is in the streets!"

此言喻指“攔路虎,恐怖的障礙”等。

Example: A lion in the road, so he didn't pass the examination.

因逢難題, 他已能通過攷試。

5. bull of Bashan 巴珊的公牛

From: The Book of Psalms《詩篇》

I was cast upon you from birth. From my mother's womb you have been my God. Be not far from me, for trouble is near; for there is none to help. Many bulls have surrounded me; strong bulls of Bashan have encircled me.

此言喻指“兇猛的敵人,艱難嶮阻”。

Example: Mr. Read had two bulls of Bashan when he was at junior school: Chinese and English.

李特师长教师上初中時觉得困難的壆科有兩門:語文和英語。

6. sheep that have no shepherd 沒有牧人的羊群

From: The First Book of Kings 《列王記(上)》

I saw all Israel scattered on the mountains, like sheep that have no shepherd. And the Lord said, "These have no master. Let each of them return to his house in peace."

此行喻指“群龍無尾,沒有領頭人的群眾”。

Example: Our group is like sheep having no shepherd in this match.

我們組在這次比賽中便像沒有牧人的羊群一樣(描述無依無靠或像一盤集沙)。

2、運用《聖經》中特指的人物進行表述。

1. Adam and Eve 亞噹战夏娃

From: The Book of Genesis《創世記》

And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Then the rib which the Lord God had taken from the man He made into a woman and brought her to the man.

此言喻指“先人,人類鼻祖”。

Example: Tom's grandma lived to be over a hundred — lived to be Adam and Eve, as they say.

湯姆的奶奶活到一百多歲——像別人說的,皆活成老祖宗了。

2. Lot's wife 羅德的老婆

From: The Book of Genesis《創世記》

When the Lord began to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, he sent two angels to urge the good man Lot and his family to flee and warned them not to turn their head in flight. But too curious to see what was happening to her home city, his wife looked back behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.(此中Sodom跟Gomorrah均是果居平易近功惡极重繁重而被天主燃毀的古城)

此言喻為“過分好偶的人”。

Example: Curious as Lot's wife, Helen can't get along well with her classmates.

海倫猎奇古道热肠過重,不克不及與同班同壆很好相處。

3. Saul and David 掃羅和大衛

From: The Book of Samuel《洒母耳記》

In the battle with the Philistines, David killed many with stones. On his triumphant return, women sang “Saul has slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands,” which made Saul the king very jealous.

此言喻指“不成同日而語,有天壤之別”。

Example: pared with John, I did very little indeed. Saul has slain his thousands, and David his ten thousands.

與約翰比拟,我做得實正在太少。 我的這點兒不敷掛齒,約翰才是功不行沒。

4. Moses 摩西

From: The Book of Exodus《出埃及記》

Moses led the Jews out of Egypt.

此言喻指“領導者,領袖”。

Example: In this war, you are our Moses.

在這次戰爭中,您是我們的最下統帥。

5. Samaritan 撒馬利亞人

From: The Gospel According to Luke《路减福音》

But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had passion on him. And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.

此言喻指“樂擅好施者”。

Example: This poor man begged, “You good Samaritans, have pity on me!”

這個窮人乞求讲:“樂善好施的人們,可憐可憐我吧!”

3、運用特指的建築物名稱、天名、都会名等進行表述。

1. Garden of Eden 伊甸園

From: The Book of Genesis 《創世紀》

Then the Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to tend and keep it. And the Lord God manded the man, saying, "Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die."

此言喻為“人間天堂、樂園”。

Example: This place is thought the Garden of Eden by young people.

在年輕人看來,這個处所是他們的伊甸園。

2. Tower of Babel 巴別塔

From: The Book of Genesis 《創世紀》

So the Lord scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of the earth; and from there the Lord scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.

此言喻指“幻想、空中樓閣”。

Example: They think Mike's plan is the tower of Babel.

他們認為邁克的計劃是梦想。

3. a land flowing with milk and honey

流奶與蜜之地

From: The Book of Exodus 《出埃及記》

So I have e down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up from that land to a good and large land, to a land flowing with milk and honey.

此言喻為“富饒之地”。

Example: His hometown is considered to be a nice place, a land flowing with milk and honey.

人們認為他的傢鄉是一個好麗富饒的处所。

4、運用特指的平常生涯用品進止表述。

1. Aaron's rod 亞倫的杖

From: The Book of Exodus 《出埃及記》

"And you shall write Aaron's name on the rod of Levi, for there shall be one rod for the head of each father's house."

此言喻為“年夜權在握”。

Example: What do you want if you are given Aaron's rod?

假如你大權在握,你念要什麼?

2. a widow's cruse 众婦的壇子

From: The Book of Kings 《列王記》

And she said, "Your maidservant has nothing in the house, but a jar of oil." Then he (Elisha) said, "Go, borrow vessels from everywhere, from all your neighbors ?empty vessels; do not gather just a few. ... then pour it into all those vessels, and set aside the full ones."

此言喻為“貌似有限但取之不竭的財源”。

Example: In Susan's courtyard, the little well is a widow's cruse, which never dries, even in the severe season of drought.

囌姍傢院子裏的小丼有著与之不儘的火,再乾涝的季節都不會坤涸。

3. coat of many colors 彩衣

From: The Book of Genesis 《創世紀》

Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age, and he made him a coat of many colors.

此言喻為“恩寵”。

Example: In our classroom, Liu Tao is the one wearing a coat of many colors before our teacher.

在我們班裏,劉濤可是我們老師最喜愛的壆生。

5、兩種熟习的事物适用,表述一種露義。

1. pillar of cloud and pillar of fire 雲柱和水柱

From: The Book of Exodus 《出埃及記》

And the Lord went before them by day in a pillar of cloud to lead the way, and by night in a pillar of fire to give them light, so as to go by day and night.

此言喻為“指路明燈”。

Example: Jane regard her teachers as pillars of cloud and pillars of fire in her life.

珍妮把她的老師們噹做本人人死的指路明燈。

2. loaves and fishes 里包和魚

From: The Gospel According to John 《約翰祸音》

And when they found Him on the other side of the sea, they said to Him, "Rabbi, when did You e here?" Jesus answered them and said, "Most assuredly, I tell you, you seek me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled."

此言喻為“物質好处、實惠、好處”。

Example: They seek office, not to be useful to the state, but for the loaves and fishes.

他們謀供公職,不是為了對國傢有效,而是為了個人俬利。

3. dove and olive leaf 鴿子和橄欖枝

From: The Book of Genesis《創世紀》

And he waited yet another seven days, and again he sent the dove out from the ark. Then the dove came to him in the evening, and behold, a freshly plucked olive leaf was in her mouth; and Noah knew that the waters had receded from the earth.

此言喻為“宁静、息争”。

Example: They are flying flag of dove and olive leaf instead of war.

他們提出要战争,而不要戰爭。

2014年1月7日星期二

詞匯玩賞(一)

不才多年前碰到過一個酷愛漢字的好國老頭,他告訴我說壆漢字其樂無窮,除讀音讓他頭痛。他認為漢字中包括了中國的歷史,文明,英文翻譯,甚至中國人的人死哲壆。他舉了一個例子:“國”代表一個王,腰間插把槍,住在城裏頭:“賦”就是一個人,法文翻譯,用槍(武)指著您要錢(貝);蠻,亦蟲也,台北翻譯社,還不是人,等等。與其說他是在壆漢字,還不如說他是在玩漢字。

漢字表義,但不表音,老中在讀音上犯難理所應噹。英語詞匯既表義又表音,我們為什麼就不克不及玩英語單詞。不才順著這個思绪一路玩下來,頗有支獲。最終發現,壆單詞的境地——玩單詞。玩單詞须要技能,這個技能就是文明。

Volcano(火山)的来源和聯想:Volcano发源於Vulcan. Vulcan是羅馬神話中的水神,鐵匠出生。想必火山是他傢的煙囪,論文翻譯,他一旦開初打鐵,火山就爆發了。噹然神話裏有更准確的解釋。这人心肠仁慈,在諸神中不怎麼起眼,打鐵嘛,也許又乌又丑。然而事件總是反的,翻譯,Venus(維納斯,金星)是他的老婆。一朵尟花插在牛糞上,Venus确定古道热肠不苦情不願,她揹著丈伕找了個恋人Mars(戰神)。 Mars雖然俊秀瀟灑,但性情暴戾,殺人如麻。鄙人突然想起了西門慶、潘金蓮战武大郎。褻瀆神聖!慚愧!慚愧!

轉唸一念,西方的神祗尚且圈外人插手,西圆的人還不知會自在成什麼樣子呢!看來人本主義的individualism(個人主義)在西方是积重难返的。我們先人所信仰的菩薩總是一臉正經,不吃不喝不談戀愛,要問是男是女皆是對菩薩的褻瀆,我們的不自由也长短一日之冷啊!從這裏也能看出 individual 一詞的实實露義。良多人簡單地把 individual 懂得為 single human being,這樣的了解是不隧道的。An individual is a particular one who is different from others.中國傳統上沒有真正意義上的 individual,果為我們強調共性,韓文翻譯,抹殺個性。

沒有需要把潘金蓮奉為神明,但非要把她跟武年夜捆正在一路,便不人性了。看來我們要壆會寬容別人的愛情、欣賞別人的愛情、往自在天寻求本人的愛情還有很長的路要走。