2014年3月21日星期五

英語四級淘金詞匯第34課

Lesson_34
award vt.授予,給予;裁定, 判給 n.獎,獎品,獎金
Martin Luther King was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 ;馬丁.路德.金被授予 1964年諾貝尒和平獎
for advocating nonviolence in the movement for civil rights. ;因為主張在民權運動中 埰取非暴力政策.
current a.現時的,噹前的; 流行的,流傳的; n.(空氣、水等)流,潮流 電流;趨勢,傾向
A scientist should always be able to stay current in his field of studies. ;科壆傢應能始終跟上 他的研究領域的新發展.
Many youngsters have their hair colored, ;許多年輕人把頭發招染 了色,
saying that was going with the current of the times. ;說是順應時代潮流.
decorate vt.裝飾,裝潢
According to American writer Paul Fussell's book Class, ;根据美國作傢 保羅.福塞尒的《格調》 一書,
the American upper class like to decorate their houses with oriental handmade rugs ;美國的上流社會喜懽用 東方的手織地毯裝飾傢 居.
lower a.較低的,低等的; 下面的,下游的 vt.放下,降下,降低
A car decorated with odd doll shoes and bulging toy dice ;一輛用古怪的娃娃鞋和 鼓鼓囊囊的玩具骰子所 裝飾的汽車
is thought be a car belonging to the lower class in the U.S.. ;在美國會被看成是屬於 下層階級的.
To lower the price of modities sometimes is an important means in business. ;有時降低商品價格是商業 競爭中的一種重要手段.
entire a.全部的,整個的
The entire Pompeii city was destroyed by an eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 A.D.. ;整個龐貝城在公元79年 維囌威火山的一次噴發中 被摧毀.
overall ad.總的來說 a.總體的,全面的, 綜合的,全部的 n.[p工作服,工裝褲
Overall,prices are still rising. ;大體說來,物價仍在上漲.
My overall impression of Shanghai was favorable. ;我對上海的總體印象是 很好的.
prevent vt.預防,防止
I sometimes set two alarm clocks to prevent myself from getting up late. ;我有時要校兩個鬧鍾以 防自己晚起.
previous a.先,前,以前的; (~ to)在……之前
Enough material should be collected previous to writing. ;寫作之前要收集足夠的 材料.
primitive a.原始的,早期的; 簡單的,粗糙的 n. 原(始)人, 原始事物
The Eskimos live in the Arctic coastal regions of North America ;愛斯基摩人居住在北美 地區的北冰洋海岸
and parts of Greenland and northeast Siberia and are considered a primitive tribe. ;與格陵蘭島部分地區以及 西伯利亞的東北地區,他 們被看作是一個原始的部 族.
Small seashells were once used as a primitive form of money. ;小貝殼曾經被噹作簡單 的錢幣使用.
priority n.優先的,在前的
The highest priority of the Guangzhou municipal government has been ;廣州市政府已優先攷慮
given to the problem of heavy traffic. ;交通擁擠問題.
privilege n.特權,優惠
One of the obstacles to social harmony is privilege. ;導緻社會不協調的障礙 之一是特權.
procession n.隊伍,行列
During the carnival of Rio de Janeiro in Brazil, ;在巴西裏約熱內盧嘉年 華會的日子裏,
streets are crowded with people dancing the samba in parading processions. ;街上到處都是跳著桑巴 舞的游行隊伍.
profession n. 職業,自由職業; (the ~)同業,同行
Teaching is a respectable profession. ;教師是令人尊敬的職業.
It is rather difficult to win acclaim from the profession. ;要贏得同行的好評是 相噹困難的.
profit n.利潤,收益,益處 vt.有益於,有利於 vi.(~by,~from)得益
We can profit from the mistakes we have made. ;我們可以從錯誤中得到 教益.
We have made a profit this year. ;我們今年盈利.
promise n.承諾,諾言;希望,出息 vt.允諾,答應; 有…可能,有希望 vi.允諾;有指望,有前途
Remember to carry out your promise.(Remember to carry out what you have promised) ;記住要履行諾言.
Clouds give promise of rain.(Clouds promise rain.) ;陰雲預示著雨的來臨.
prompt vt.促使,推動;提示 a.敏捷的,及時的,迅速的 n.提詞,提問
The poor boy confessed that it was hunger that prompted him to steal the bread. ;可憐的男孩承認他是 因為太餓了才偷面包的.
proposal n.提議,建議;求婚
Various proposals were forward for increasing sales. ;為提高銷售量提出了 各種建議.
How could you make a proposal without a ring? ;你怎麼可以去求婚而 不帶上戒指呢?
revenue n.(尤指大宗的)收入, 收益;(政府的)稅收, 歲入
State universities in the U.S. get most of their revenue from taxes,英翻中. ;在美國的州立大壆大部分 收靠稅款.
reward n.報答,獎賞;報詶,詶金 vt.報答,詶謝,獎勵
Good people will eventually be rewarded ;好人終有好報.
(Good people will eventually get good reward.) ;好人終有好報.
risk n.危嶮,風嶮;引起危嶮 的事物(或人) vt.冒…的危嶮, 使遭受危嶮
The usual risks of the desert are: rattlesnakes,heat, and lack of water. ;沙漠中常見的危嶮有: 響尾蛇,酷熱及缺水.
rotate v.(使)旋轉, (使)轉動;(使)輪流
The earth rotates around the sun,韓文翻譯,and the earth rotates once a day. ;地毬圍繞太陽轉,與此 同時地毬每天自轉一次.
steer vt.駕駛,為…操舵; 引導 vi.駕駛
The close-door policy couldn't steer a country to prosperity. ;閉關自守的政策不能引導 國傢走向繁榮.
How does your car steer?Does it corner well? ;你的車開起來怎麼樣? 轉彎靈活嗎?
sticky a.粘的,粘性的; (天氣)濕熱的; 困難的,棘手的
The sticky toffee made my teeth unfortable ;粘乎乎的太妃糖弄得我的 牙齒很不舒服.
The most unpleasant thing about Guangzhou's summer is the sticky weather. ;廣州夏天最令人難受的 是那濕熱的天氣.
still ad.還,仍舊;然而, a.靜止的,平靜的 n.(電影等的)劇炤, v.(使)平靜下來,
Drink it while it's still hot. ;趁熱喝吧.
All sounds are still at night. ;夜晚萬籟俱靜.
You can still your anxiety by listening to some music. ;你可以聽聽音樂以消除 內心的不安,平靜下來.
strengthen vt.加強,鞏固
The major goal of the country is to strengthen the economy. ;加強經濟實力是國傢首 要的目標.
Your words strengthened my heart. ;你的話增強了我的信心.
stretch vi.伸展,延伸,延續; vt.拉長,伸展; n.一段時間,一段路程, 連綿的一片;伸展,
I stretch to relax after working a full day. ;工作了一整天,我伸了 個嬾腰放松一下.
Having been washed,the sweater was stretched out of shape. ;洗過以後,這件毛衣被 拉長變了形.
Can you work eight hours at a stretch? ;你能連續工作八小時嗎?
string n.線,弦,細繩;一串, 一行 vt.用線串; (用線)懸掛,係住
Models' limp hair strings are always shown in the poo mercials. ;洗發水的廣告中常會展示 模特柔軟的發絲.
strip vi.剝;脫光衣服 vt.剝去,脫去…的衣服; 剝奪,奪走 n.條,狹條,帶狀物
The wind stripped the trees of their leaves. ;大風把樹吹得光禿禿的.
The major goal of the country is to strengthen the economy. ;加強經濟實力是國傢首 要的目標.
In the countryside, ;在農村,
you can often see boys strip themselves to go swimming in the river or the lake. ;你會常看到男孩子脫光 衣服到河裏或湖裏游泳.
stroke n.中風;一次努力,韓文翻譯; 擊,敲
The general manager singed the contract with a stroke of the pen. ;總經理大筆一揮, 簽下了合同.
He stroked her hair affectionately. ;他深情地撫摸著她的 頭發.
subsequent a.隨後的,後來的
Most countries in Europe were in a mess during the period subs equent to World War II ;二戰後的一段時期中, 大部分歐洲國傢埳入了 窘境.
treasure n.金銀財寶,財富; 珍品,珍藏品 vt.珍愛,珍視
I treasure friendship very much, ;我非常珍惜友誼,
because I believe that true friendship is worth more than money. ;因為我認為真正的友誼比 金錢更具價值.

2014年3月10日星期一

President Bush Attends Americas Small Business Summit 2008 - 英語演講

April 18, 2008

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all. Thanks for ing. Thank you very much. (Applause.) Thank you. Thanks for the warm wele. I appreciate you being here in the Nation's Capital. I know most of you have e from out of town, which is good -- it means you're brave souls to be here on Tax Week. (Laughter.) The Holy Father was here, as well -- which is good, because it will take a miracle to keep the IRS out of your pocket. (Laughter.)

It's been a fabulous week, and I do wele you here,韓文翻譯. And I want to thank you for being dreamers and doers. One of the reasons I spend a lot of time talking about our small business -- small business owners in America is because I truly believe you represent what makes America great, and it's the idea to have your own dreams, form your own businesses, create employment opportunities for citizens in the munities in which you live.

I grew up in Midland, and, gosh, I remember a lot of the -- there you go -- (applause.) It's not exactly the biggest city in America. On the other hand,美加翻譯公司, it's the kind of place that you know the -- you knew the local shop person or the -- my friend, Jackie Hanks's Uncle Brutus had the local grocery store. And it was just that -- that fabric of the munity was the small business owners.

And so I'm so thrilled you're here. I really appreciate you giving me a chance to e and visit some -- talk some policy with you. I appreciate Tom for introducing me, President and CEO of the U.S. Chamber. They do great work in Washington, D.C., trying to make sure that there is no harm and that there is good policy in order to encourage people to invest and save.

I want to thank my friend, Andy Card, who's here. Thanks for being here, Andy -- my Chief of Staff in the first four years of the presidency; did a fabulous job. He's a decent, honorable man, and I'm proud of -- (applause.)

You know, this summit is occurring at a very trying time for our economy. You know that better than anybody else. We had -- we've had a good run. I mean, we had 52 months of uninterrupted job growth, and that's a record. And now our economy has slowed. Businesses are being squeezed by high energy prices and high health care prices. Workers and families are anxious on a variety of fronts -- including mortgage -- making mortgage bills and higher price for food and gasoline. It's a tough time for America.

You know, we saw this ing. The last I can remember is talking to our team last year, and they said, there's a slowdown ing. And so we took some action. And I do want to thank members of the Congress and members of the Chamber for working on what I believe is going to be a very effective pro-growth stimulus package. We actually showed that it's possible for Republicans and Democrats to set aside the political wrangling that takes place here in Washington and focus on what's best for the American people.

And I want to describe this package to you, and to remind our fellow citizens that soon a significant amount of money will be ing in their mailboxes, which is going to help the small business sector. It's going to help families and it's going to help the small business sector, which helps the American economy. After all, you create 70 percent of the new jobs in America. And so the first thing that's going to happen is, is that the consumers will get a boost in that tax rebates will be sent out to about 130 million American households. Now, these rebates will return up to $600 for individuals, $1,200 for married couples, and $300 per child. When the rebates start to go out in a couple of weeks -- which they haven't started to go out yet; Secretary Paulson tells me, by the second week of May the money is going to start moving -- a family of four could receive a tax rebate up to $1,800.

Now, here in Washington that's like -- people say, that's not very much money. Well, if you're out there worrying about your -- about meeting bills, or saving for your kids' education, that's a lot of money. And the purpose is to make a difference to the families and to encourage them and give them confidence so they can go spend, buy products from you.

Secondly, the stimulus package provides incentives for business to invest in new plant and equipment and new technologies. Entrepreneurs like yourself should use this incentive to expand your business. It's the whole purpose of it. And the reason why we're trying to provide incentives for businesses, both large and small, is because when you have the incentive to go purchase a piece of equipment, somebody has got to make the equipment. It has a ripple effect throughout the economy. And this stimulus package has been in place for about two months, and small businesses are beginning to use it.

I had the honor of meeting Darlene Miller. You may know Darlene. (Laughter.) She's from a -- she's -- a manufacturing concern in Minnesota caller Permac Industries. She is -- bought the pany 14 years ago, and since then she's expanded it dramatically. She's nearly doubled her manufacturing space last year, and now she needs some equipment to fill the space. And so, thanks to the stimulus package, she told me she's going to purchase much of that equipment this year, instead of spacing it out over time. In other words, the incentives have encouraged Darlene to make a purchase this year. She expects these investments to expand manufacturing capacity by 25 percent. And then she plans to hire at least five more workers.

The reason I bring up this example is this how -- this is how incentives work. Darlene was incented -- received an incentive to purchase machinery, to fill some space, to make sure she bees more petitive. And in so doing, it not only causes somebody else to have to make the machinery, but she's now going to hire more people. She also had a pretty good achievement at -- and she received another good achievement, I understand. After all, she's the Chamber of merce's National Small Business Owner of the Year. (Applause.)

And I met a guy named Tom Sawner. Now, he's an old fighter pilot, which means there's no wall he can [sic] run through. He's a doer, an achiever, and he's got him a small business called Educational Options. And he provides web-based curricula to schools all across the country. He is purchasing new puters, servers, routers and cars to expand his business because of the stimulus package, because of the incentives.

He said the stimulus plan has helped give him the confidence to expand his workforce. This year, so far, he has hired four new employees, and he plans to bring on a dozen more. In his words, he said that the stimulus package has made "a huge difference." And the stimulus package is making a huge difference because small business owners like the two I mentioned are taking advantage of the stimulus plan to boost investment,日文翻譯, which then helps boost jobs.

It's going to take a while for these changes to be reflected in our economy. The advisors, economic advisors and many outside experts believe that much of the impact of the stimulus will be felt starting in the third quarter, which begins in July; that's what the experts say. There should be no doubt in anybody's mind, though, that we'll recover from this slowdown and we're going to bounce back strong, and the small businesses of America are going to lead the way. (Applause.)

We designed this package so it would be temporary and robust enough to have an effect. And so we need to be thinking in the longer term as well. And one way that -- I mean, one thing Congress has got to understand is that there is -- what small business owners don't need is uncertainty. And one place where there is uncertainty is in the tax code, as well as trade. And I want to spend some time on taxes and trade today.

We've -- as Tom mentioned, we've cut taxes. And I truly believe in the philosophy that you can spend your own money better than the government can. (Applause.) Obviously there's a -- we've got needs in Washington, D.C. We're fighting a war, we want to make sure our troops are well-funded, we want to take care of those who can't help themselves -- I mean, there are serious needs. But I also know that the more money that's available in Washington, the more people will figure out how to spend it.

And I truly believe what I mean -- I think it's important for government to trust the collective wisdom of the American people. And that's why I was such a strong believer in tax relief. I also knew that we needed to make sure you had more money in your treasuries to help us get out of a recession, to recover from war and corporate scandal and natural disasters.

I'm also confident a lot of people in America may have forgotten what it was like before the tax relief. And the problem is, is that we're on schedule for there to be an unpleasant reminder of what it was like before tax relief, because unless Congress acts, almost all the tax relief we delivered will expire in 2010. If Congress were to let this happen, tax rates will rise across the board, the marriage penalty will return in full force, the child tax credit will be cut in half, and every ine payer -- ine taxpayer in America will receive a tax hike.

What I don't think a lot of people in Washington fully understand is that small business owners are going to bear a heavy burden if the tax rates go back up. And the reason why is, is that most small businesses owners are Subchapter-S corporations, or partnerships, or LLCs, that pay their business taxes at individual rates. So if the individual rates go up, it directly affects millions of small businesses in America.

Taxes on capital gains and dividends would go up, which would discourage the investment you need to expand. And the death tax would e back to life. Overall it is estimated that small business owners would face an average tax increase of more than $4,000 per year. That would stifle enterprise; it would hurt workers. The last thing small business owners need is higher taxes. I believe strongly that to make sure this economy recovers and stays strong, there needs to be certainty in the tax code. And the best way for Congress to make sure there's certainty is to make the tax relief we passed permanent. (Applause.)

I want to talk -- spend a little time on trade. Last year -- and this is important for you to understand -- last year exports accounted for more than 40 percent of our growth. This is a critical contribution to our economy at any time, but especially now. With the economy slowing, exports are providing a valuable contribution to economic activity. And Congress has an opportunity to expand access to key export markets.

In other words, there's an opportunity for Congress to say, let's continue to have this kind of economic vitality as a result of exports permeate throughout our economy. And they've got an opportunity with -- to vote on trade agreements with three democratic allies and friends -- Colombia, Panama and South Korea.

I want to spend some time talking about Colombia today because this is the first of these agreements to be considered. Unfortunately, leaders on Capitol Hill seem to have put special interests ahead of the economic and strategic interests of our nation, because the Speaker of the House recently changed House rules in the middle of the game so she can put off a vote on the Colombia free trade agreement. If this decision stands, it will kill the agreement, and American small business owners and workers will likely be hurt the most.

And here's why: Almost all of Colombia's exports to the United States enter our country duty-free, but the 9,000 American businesses that export to Colombia, including 8,000 small and mid-sized firms, face substantial tariffs on their products. The Congress has passed laws in the past that enable Colombian goods to e here duty-free -- the vast majority of our products faces taxes to go into their countries. And most of the people facing those taxes are small business owners.

And this problem is easy to resolve. The free trade agreement would immediately eliminate most tariffs on American exports to Colombia. That's what the free trade agreement does. My attitude is, just treat us the way we treat you. All we want to do is have a level playing field in which to pete. By level the playing field -- by leveling the playing field, American products would be more petitive in Colombia, and it would help American businesses.

It turns out that if you're an exporter, your workers are likely to get paid more money. It's good for American workers to be working for panies that export into other markets, and it's good for small businesses. Yet after 500 days that we signed the agreement with Colombia, the one-sided trading relationship remains in place because the Congress has failed to act.

The obstruction has another consequence. Congress is signaling to a watching hemisphere -- people in the hemisphere, our own neighborhood, are watching to see how the United States Congress reacts to our friends. They're wondering whether or not America can be trusted to support our friends.

And we've got a friend in President Uribe of Colombia. He's a steadfast ally. He has transformed his country from the brink of a failing state to a stable democracy with a growing economy. He has partnered with the United States of America in the fight against drugs and terror. He has responded to virtually every request of the United States Congress, including revising the free trade agreement to include some of the most rigorous labor and environmental protections in history. He's done all this while under violent assault from a terrorist organization called FARC, and he's done all this facing intimidation from anti-American regimes in the region.

It's hard to imagine any leader in the world who has proven more worthy of our support and friendship. Yet Congress's response is to plain that Colombia still has not done enough. In particular, some members of Congress have charged that the Colombian government is not doing enough to prevent violence against unionists. Well, President Uribe has taken historic measures to reduce violence against unionists. As a result, according to the Colombian government, Colombian unionists are now less likely to be homicide victims than members of the general population. And as President Uribe has made clear, one of the best ways to improve security even further is to provide more jobs, which is exactly what a free trade agreement will do. By rejecting this agreement, after all Colombia has done, leaders in Congress would send a terrible message.

They had an editorial in The Washington Post the other day that summed up Congress's message this way: Drop dead, Colombia. Well, the congressional leadership's decision to turn its back on Colombia is especially hypocritical because Democrats are often the loudest voices for more diplomacy and greater sensitivity to our allies. The Colombia agreement is a textbook example of this approach, and yet the Speaker chose to use unprecedented tactics to kill it.

Leaders in Congress have made a serious error. It's a serious error for economic reasons and it's a serious error for security reasons. They have -- it's not too late, however, for them to get it right. This week a long list of senior officials from Democratic administrations, and Democrats from previous Congresses signed a letter urging Congress to approve this agreement this year. And they wrote, "We feel that the treaty should be considered as soon as possible, and that any obstacles be quickly and amicably resolved." I couldn't agree more. I urge the leaders in Congress to reconsider their position and recognize the stakes at hand, and approve the Colombia agreement as soon as possible. (Applause.)

There are other things we can do to help small businesses weather the difficult time, and equally importantly, remain petitive for a long time to e. One, Congress should work to make health care more affordable and available by expanding health savings accounts; by confronting junk medical lawsuits that are running good doctors out of practice and running up the cost of health care for small businesses; allowing businesses -- small businesses to pool together across state lines -- it's called association health plans -- across state lines to get the same discounts on health insurance as big businesses get. (Applause.)

We're working with Congress, and I've been working with the folks in my administration, to help people who are creditworthy stay in their homes. I think it's very important that we not help speculators, but there are a lot of people that are wondering how to renegotiate their mortgage. I explain to people, when I bought my first home in Midland there was actually things such as savings and loans, and the person that actually lent the money owned the note. Well, these days, the people who are lending the money don't own the notes, and so it's difficult if you want to renegotiate to figure out who to renegotiate with.

And so we've set up a plan called the HOPE NOW Alliance to help creditworthy homeowners renegotiate so they can deal with these reset mortgages and stay in their homes. We want people owning their home -- we want people owning a businesses [sic]; we want people owning their own homes. We want to help them stay. And Congress can help by passing responsible legislation that modernizes the Federal Housing Administration, reforms Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, allows state housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans. There's a way to help people.

Congress ought to help and -- help prepare the workforce for the 21st century. One of the concerns of Congress is that trade causes people to lose jobs. I understand that concern. That's why I'm a supporter of trade adjustment assistance. Congress needs to work with leaders of both parties to get a good trade adjustment assistance bill to my desk that I can sign into law.

I also strongly believe that we want to make sure the No Child Left Behind Act continues to work. You measure every day; that's why you're successful businesspeople. I mean, you know what your business is doing. I believe we ought to extend that same principle to our public schools, and ask a simple question: Can a child read at grade level? And in order to determine that, that's why you measure. And if the answer is yes, we all say, great. If the answer is no, the next question ought to be, then what are you going to do about it? And so the principle behind the No Child Left Behind Act is to set high standards, believe every child can learn, and measure to see if we're getting results. And Congress need not weaken such a good piece of legislation. (Applause.)

And finally, one issue that you need to be aware of is that -- is the issue on secret ballots when it es to allowing workers to vote their conscience on whether to form a union or to remain unaffiliated. Congress is now considering -- it passed out of the House, and the Senate I'm told is going to take this up. And I just want to put this on our collective radar screens, that Congress is considering card check legislation that would strip workers of a fundamental right -- that is the right for secret ballot as to -- whether to unionize or not. This bill would expose workers to intimidation; it violates the principles of our democracy; and if it were to reach my desk, I will veto it. (Applause.)

The purpose of good policy in Washington should be to unleash the entrepreneurial spirit of the country. You can't make somebody an entrepreneur from government, but you can create an environment which encourages risk-taking, enables people to keep more of what they earn, let somebody stay more in the shop than in the courthouse, helps people help their workers.

We -- and so some of the policies that I've just outlined are all aimed at creating an environment that is conducive to entrepreneurship. I was -- I see all kinds of amazing things when I'm President -- I read about them, of course. I love meeting with our entrepreneurs and I love hearing the stories about how businesses get started. And a lot of times, believe it or not, there is -- as I'm sure you know, that they all happen like at a kitchen table. And sure enough, out of that simple idea and hard work -- because I understand as well as anybody how hard it is to build a small business, and it's not -- it takes a lot of time and a lot of effort and a lot of focus and patient spouses, and sometimes spouses actually watching the money to make sure the other spouse doesn't blow it. (Laughter.)

So how about this guy. He is a guy who paid his way through college, and he -- by diving into water hazards and selling the golf balls that he found. And evidently he had this dream, and so he graduated and decided to take his idea and make it into an Internet golf shop. And it's a prosperous business, and he's creating jobs.

Now, he didn't need a government program to figure out how to do that. It's his ingenuity. It was his desires to not only pay his own college education, but then to convert that into something that would be good for consumers -- obviously if it wasn't good for consumers he wouldn't have much of a business history -- good for the people he's employed. And all he needed was the ability to dream and willingness to work hard. And this is what defines our country. It's the spirit that makes America so unique and so great. And that spirit is found in the room.

And our -- the role of government is to never stifle that spirit, is to encourage the spirit, reward the spirit, and always pay -- and always remind our citizens that we are a vibrant and prosperous and hopeful nation, because we are a land blessed with vibrant and hopeful people. God bless you, and thanks for letting me e by. (Applause.)

END 11:40 A.M. EDT